The Provisional Government Period in Harbin

cerstaff
Pre-1911 Chinese officials of the Jilin foreign affairs bureau and Chinese Eastern Railway staff. Source.

In an earlier post, we examined a Chinese report on the March 1917 uprisings in Harbin as a case study of the complexities of revolution in a Russian colony. The railway zone was, after all, a sharply contested territory, in which Chinese sovereignty had not been ceded for good. Such ambiguities only deepened as 1917 wore on, as illustrated by the following letter by Jilin governor Guo Zongxi on the post-revolutionary administration of Harbin. The English text has been re-paragraphed.

案查哈爾濱旅居俄僑變政后各項情形,業陸續咨報在案。現在又據探報,本埠俄人所組之臨時執行部,其內部共分兩部:曰立法部,系各界暨各團體代表集合而成。凡遇本埠一切大小問題以及紳民懇請事件,皆由此部集合全體代表而議定之,開議時即以法律師阿立山大羅夫為議長,其定議案之法,取大多數代表贊同為決定,既定之后,即直接施行於本埠各機關,如中東鐵路公司及各級審判廳、檢查廳、巡警廳等處。又曰委員會,系由立法部議員內推定數人,專為執行立法部所頒布之議案,並接收呈紙,延見來賓,對答外界責問之人,暨對於各機關及個人辦理一切交際事項。此會中會長亦系阿立山大羅夫,有時阿氏一人辦理,不及則以倭立佛維赤代之,倭氏系本埠商人。其會中內部文牘事宜,則以法律師喀紫羅孚斯基擔任之。臨時執行部成立之后,至今無更變,探其原因,系因俄國中央新政府現已有召集正式國會之舉,必俟正式國會開議之后,議定全國一致辦法頒布到哈,彼時方能從事變更一切。現在臨時執行部委員會會長阿立山大羅夫氏,系因其平素主持民主之論,出於熱誠,且其為人和平親藹,向無偏激之論,故此次得被推舉為立法部議長兼執行委員會會長。現出[除]阿氏之外,最有勢力者為倭立佛維赤氏與王爵顧庫壽氏。按倭立佛維赤氏系本部商人,乃俄籍之猶太人,王爵顧庫壽氏系本埠俄亞銀行總經理。此外尚有法律師喀紫羅孚斯基以議員身份而兼任委員會之秘書。又日前德升帶同翻譯,面訪阿氏,談及現在諸事均未就緒,但少年軍人急躁過甚,欲使之稍安勿躁,甚覺不易云云。

又據該會議院某某聲稱,此次革命發生之初,俄國人民對於中東鐵路界內之一切行政布置,均不滿意,急欲乘此大亂,一舉而推翻之,軍人對此節更覺激烈,當即召集各代表秘密討論至十余日之久。旋由阿立山大羅夫等出席建言,略謂中東路界乃我俄羅斯租佃地之性質,租戶在所租地內宜守永久不易之約,不得朝令夕改,致使地主生疑,凡一切改絃更張之事,行之於我國內地則可,若行之於中國租地內則不可。此語嗣為全體承認,各代表均無爭執之言。由此觀之,雖俄國內地之更張,現尚不能預定,而東省中東鐵路界內,想不能有大更變矣等請。

據此,除咨呈國務院暨分咨內務、陸軍部外,相應咨請大部查照。

Regarding the various post-revolutionary circumstances of the Russian migrants living in Harbin, successive reports have been made and are on file. Now, according to an intelligence report, the Executive Committee formed by the Harbin Russians is internally divided into two sections. The legislative section is formed from the assembled representatives of the various social groups and organisations. All matters in Harbin large or small, or gentry and popular petitions are decided by a meeting of the whole body of representatives. During their meetings, the lawyer Aleksandrov acts as chairman, and proposals are decided on via the approval of the majority of delegates. Once a decision has been made, it is directly implemented in the various organisations in Harbin, such as the Chinese Eastern Railway Company or the courts, inspectorates and police of different levels.

The other section is a committee comprising a few people elected by members of the legislative section, dedicated to implementing the proposals promulgated by that section, as well as receiving correspondence, meeting guests and answering external inquiries. In other words, it manages all institutional and personal communications. This committee is also headed by Aleksandrov. He sometimes handles matters alone, but when unable to he is replaced by Vol’fovich, who is a Harbin merchant. The committee’s internal paperwork is handled by the lawyer Kozlovskii [unsure of name – ed.].

Since the establishment of the Executive Committee, it has not undergone any changes until now. Upon investigation, the reason is that the new central government in Russia now plans to call a Constituent Assembly, and it is necessary to wait until the Assembly has opened, decided on a unified solution for the entire country and promulgated it in Harbin. Only then can anything be changed.

The current chairman of the Executive Committee, Aleksandrov, staunchly upholds democratic views, which are warm and sincere. He behaves in a peaceable and friendly way, never expressing extreme opinions. Hence, he was elected as the head of the legislative section as well as of the [communications] committee. Now, apart from Aleksandrov, the most influential individuals are Vol’fovich and Prince Kugushev [G.G. Kugushev – ed.]. Vol’fovich is a Harbin merchant and a Russian Jew, while Prince Kugushev is the managing director of the Russo-Asiatic Bank in Harbin. Apart from them, the lawyer Kozlovskii as a member of the assembly also serves as the secretary of the [communications] committee.

A few days ago De Sheng [probably a traditional courtesy name – ed.] went with a translator to meet Aleksandrov. The conversation touched on how matters are still not ripe at present, but youths and soldiers are overly impetuous. He felt that calming them would not be easy.

Furthermore, according to one of the Committee members, when the current revolution occurred the Russian people were entirely dissatisfied with all the administrative arrangements in the CER zone. They were anxious to use it as an opportunity for an uprising to topple the administration in one stroke. At this juncture the soldiers were especially fired up, and a secret meeting was immediately called that debated matters for more than ten days. Whereupon Aleksandrov etc came with a statement, saying in effect that the CER zone had the character of one of their Russian concessions. Tenants in a leasehold should abide by their agreements unfailingly, not change their decrees in the course of a day, giving rise to the landlord’s suspicion. All innovations may take place in Russia’s domestic territory but cannot be implemented in Chinese leaseholds. These words were then approved by the entire body, with no objections from any of the delegates. From this it may be seen that although Russia’s domestic reforms are now still unpredictable, it seems that no great changes may be seen in the Railway zone in Manchuria.

Regarding these matters, apart from submitting a report to the State Council and Interior and Army ministries, a copy is despatched for your Ministry’s reference.

Letter from Jilin governor Guo Zongxi, 25 May 1917 (sent 22 May). Zhong-e guanxi shiliao, Minguo jiunian zhi banian (1917-1919). E zhengbian yu yiban jiaoshe (1), pp. 100-101.
gzxgrave
“Outstanding in all the universe”. Inscription by Guo Zongxi, dated April 1917, on the grave of revolutionary leader Huang Xing in the Yuelu Mountains, Changsha. Huang had been one of Sun Yat-sen’s chief supporters; Guo’s choice of text compares him to Confucius. Source.

Guo’s account of the new administration in Harbin reveals several uncanny parallels with the situation in Russia. There was the widespread dissatisfaction with the pre-revolutionary governance of the Railway zone, which was not fully addressed by the incoming Executive Committee. The backgrounds of the leaders mentioned by Guo are somewhat obscure. Chairman V.I. Aleksandrov in particular seems to have been rather wealthy, as part-owner of the Hotel Moderne in Harbin. Marc Kasanin’s memoirs, China in the Twenties, mentions a lawyer named Kozlovsky who had taken part in the 1905 Revolution in Harbin (Kasanin 1973, p. 131), and Vol’fovich may have been a Socialist Revolutionary (Robert Scalapino and George Yu, Modern China and its Revolutionary Process, p. 590). Nevertheless, like the Provisional Government, the Executive Committee was staffed by “bourgeois” moderates from trade or the professions.

At the time of writing a unified Harbin Soviet of workers and soldiers had not yet been formed – it would only come into existence in June – but, as in Russia, soldiers had already overtaken moderate reformers in their radicalism. The desire for further political change was met with calls for patience. No more innovations could take place until the Constituent Assembly was convened – a delay that proved fatal for the Provisional Government in Russia, as in Harbin.

However, there was an additional reason for the Executive Committee to prevaricate. As Aleksandrov pointed out, the Railway zone was technically a leasehold where Chinese and Russian control were entangled. Rash administrative decisions might not only contravene the 1896 Sino-Russian treaty that established the zone, they could also invite legitimate Chinese intervention. More than in Russia itself, the revolutionary movement in Harbin had to contend with the sovereign rights of another state.

Frustration with the “frozen” state of affairs in Harbin would soon reach a head. As summer turned to autumn, the Bolsheviks would soon gain power in the newly-constituted Harbin Soviet, as they did in Russia itself. Waiting in the wings was Railway general manager Horvath, who represented pre-revolutionary authority and was a known quantity to the Chinese. Events in Petrograd would soon be mirrored thousands of miles away in the Railway zone, with one crucial difference: Chinese officials were waiting for the opportunity to act.

One thought on “The Provisional Government Period in Harbin

  1. Pingback: Policing Post-Tsarist Harbin – Shots Across the Amur 黑龍江對岸的槍聲

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s